
While only an introductory column, Santorum proves to be clear and concise in his expectations and demands: He's conservative, the Inquirer and its readers are not, and by golly, can't we all just agree to disagree?
But this column, like many others -- the New York Press' Ed Koch column comes to mind -- are indicative of the on-the-fence citizen journalists of the world (well, the op/ed ones, anyway) -- they're not paid op/ed journalists, they're not faceless Joe Schmoes from next door, they're right in the middle -- people who are paid (or elected) to have opinions, just not for the paper.
A former senator like Santorum is educated in the politics of what he's experienced his entire elected career, but he's not "a big-J journalist" until he hangs it all up for his newspaper. And even then, he might not shake his old work history. Is Rick Santorum an op/ed citizen journalist if he backs his opinions up with researched fact?
Or does it matter that he was once a politician? Or that he's currently working for a think tank? How about if he gave up all of his ties and just started blogging?
I'm not sure. But this kind of informal legitimacy -- this fuzzy mental licensing of journalists -- is exactly at the heart of the citizen journalist debate. Hopefully, Santorum keeps to the facts and doesn't blow hot air without a fire behind it.
No comments:
Post a Comment